ModelRefs / eDiscovery Triage — Canonical Workflow
eDiscovery Triage — Canonical Workflow
eDiscovery Triage: provisional AI workflow implementation reference with candidate models, providers, tools, and architecture.
Overview
Cluster, tag, and prioritize authorized review sets with source traceability, sampling, chain-of-custody controls, and attorney review for relevance, responsiveness, and privilege. Legal deployment requires matter- and jurisdiction-specific review of access, confidentiality, retention, privilege, and applicable professional obligations. Candidate outputs should preserve source-document and page traceability and route missing, conflicting, or interpretive issues to qualified legal reviewers. These pages describe provisional review support, not legal advice, privilege assurance, or a compliance determination.
Implementation profile
| Category | llms |
|---|---|
| Implementation maturity | enterprise |
| Primary use cases | extraction, reasoning |
| Deployment options | managed-api, hybrid |
| Architectures | serverless-api, managed-container, hybrid-private-cloud |
What this evidence does not establish
- No jurisdiction, matter, review protocol, corpus, issue taxonomy, privilege policy, sampling design, production rule, or threshold is registered.
- No measured recall, precision, elusion rate, privilege incident, reviewer agreement, correction burden, or production outcome is attached.
Candidate models with published references
- BGE-M3
- GPT-5
- GPT-5 Mini
- Claude Sonnet 4.5
- Claude Opus 4
- Gemini 3 Pro
- Llama 4 Scout
- DeepSeek R1
- Mistral Large 2
- Command R+
- o3
- o4 Mini
Coverage means the model is a candidate worth evaluating for this workflow, not a ranking or a recommendation. Models whose reference pages are still in review are omitted.
Benchmarks relevant to this workflow
- GPQA Diamond — Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A in physics, chemistry, and biology.
- MMLU-Pro — Harder MMLU successor with 10-option questions and reduced contamination.
- MMLU — Massive Multitask Language Understanding — 57 academic and professional subjects.
These are the benchmarks whose task shape bears on this workflow. Each one only describes its own protocol and date, so confirm the harness matches your workload before treating a score as evidence.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to eDiscovery Triage — Canonical Workflow.