ModelRefs / Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Mistral Small 3.1: Mistral Small 3.1 is Mistral AI's 24-billion-parameter multimodal model, accepting text and image input across a context window of up to 128,000 tokens and published under Apache 2.0. Mistral reports inference speeds of 150 tokens per second and compares it with Gemma 3 and GPT-4o Mini in the same weight class. Its size and licence make it one of the larger models that remains practical to self-host on a single machine.

Qwen2.5-VL 72B: Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is the largest vision-language model in Alibaba's Qwen2.5-VL line, accepting images and video alongside text. Qwen highlights comprehension of videos over an hour long, structured extraction from documents such as invoices, forms and tables, visual grounding returned as bounding boxes or points, and agentic computer and phone use. The published config sets a 32,768-token context, and Qwen advises against YaRN extension here because it degrades temporal and spatial localisation.

Context window: Mistral Small 3.1 accepts up to 128,000 tokens, Qwen2.5-VL 72B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B at a glance

AttributeMistral Small 3.1Qwen2.5-VL 72B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba
Released2025-03-172025-01-26
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$0.1/M tokensFree / self-hosted
Output price$0.3/M tokensFree / self-hosted
LicenceApache-2.0Qwen License
Self-hostableYes, open weightsYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Reasoning: Mistral Small 3.1 63%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 75%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
  • Cost Efficiency: Mistral Small 3.1 95%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 100%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Mistral Small 3.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?

Mistral Small 3.1 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 cheaper than Qwen2.5-VL 72B?

Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00000 on this page.