ModelRefs / Text Embedding 3 Large vs InternVL2.5 78B
Text Embedding 3 Large vs InternVL2.5 78B
Text Embedding 3 Large vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your st…
Overview
InternVL2.5 78B: InternVL2.5 78B is OpenGVLab's multimodal model in the ViT-MLP-LLM configuration, pairing the InternViT-6B-448px-V2.5 vision encoder with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct as its language model for roughly 78 billion parameters in total. It keeps InternVL 2.0's architecture and advances instead through training and test-time strategy and a larger, filtered data mixture. The project is released under the MIT licence, while the Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct component it embeds carries the Qwen licence.
Text Embedding 3 Large: Text Embedding 3 Large is OpenAI's larger third-generation embedding model, returning 3,072-dimension vectors from inputs of up to 8,192 tokens. Its dimensions parameter shortens the vector at creation time without, as OpenAI puts it, the embedding losing its concept-representing properties, which lets a retrieval system trade index size against accuracy without changing models. Shortening at creation is preferred to truncating afterwards, which requires re-normalising the vector.
Context window: InternVL2.5 78B accepts up to 32,768 tokens, Text Embedding 3 Large up to 8,191. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
InternVL2.5 78B vs Text Embedding 3 Large at a glance
| Attribute | InternVL2.5 78B | Text Embedding 3 Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenGVLab | OpenAI |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-01-25 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 8,191 tokens |
| Input price | Free / self-hosted | $0.13/M tokens |
| Output price | Free / self-hosted | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | No, hosted only |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, Embedding |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: InternVL2.5 78B 100%, Text Embedding 3 Large 99%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Text Embedding 3 Large vs InternVL2.5 78B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Text Embedding 3 Large or InternVL2.5 78B?
Text Embedding 3 Large and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Text Embedding 3 Large cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?
Compare $0.00013 vs $0.00000 on this page.