ModelRefs / QwQ 32B vs InternVL2.5 78B
QwQ 32B vs InternVL2.5 78B
QwQ 32B vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
InternVL2.5 78B: InternVL2.5 78B is OpenGVLab's multimodal model in the ViT-MLP-LLM configuration, pairing the InternViT-6B-448px-V2.5 vision encoder with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct as its language model for roughly 78 billion parameters in total. It keeps InternVL 2.0's architecture and advances instead through training and test-time strategy and a larger, filtered data mixture. The project is released under the MIT licence, while the Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct component it embeds carries the Qwen licence.
QwQ 32B: QwQ 32B is the reasoning model of Alibaba's Qwen series, a 32.5-billion-parameter causal language model (31.0 billion excluding embeddings) with 64 layers and grouped-query attention using 40 query and 8 key-value heads. It is built to work through a problem before answering rather than responding directly. The full context length is 131,072 tokens, though Qwen notes that prompts beyond 8,192 tokens require YaRN to be enabled. Released under Apache 2.0.
Context window: InternVL2.5 78B accepts up to 32,768 tokens, QwQ 32B up to 131,072. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
InternVL2.5 78B vs QwQ 32B at a glance
| Attribute | InternVL2.5 78B | QwQ 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenGVLab | Alibaba |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-03-06 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Input price | Free / self-hosted | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | Free / self-hosted | $0.6/M tokens |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: InternVL2.5 78B 100%, QwQ 32B 91%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to QwQ 32B vs InternVL2.5 78B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, QwQ 32B or InternVL2.5 78B?
QwQ 32B and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is QwQ 32B cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?
Compare $0.00015 vs $0.00000 on this page.