ModelRefs / InternVL2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
InternVL2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
InternVL2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
InternVL2.5 78B: InternVL2.5 78B is OpenGVLab's multimodal model in the ViT-MLP-LLM configuration, pairing the InternViT-6B-448px-V2.5 vision encoder with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct as its language model for roughly 78 billion parameters in total. It keeps InternVL 2.0's architecture and advances instead through training and test-time strategy and a larger, filtered data mixture. The project is released under the MIT licence, while the Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct component it embeds carries the Qwen licence.
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B: Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is Alibaba's code-specialised model, 32.5 billion parameters (31.0 billion excluding embeddings) trained on 5.5 trillion tokens of source code, text-code grounding and synthetic data, and released under Apache 2.0. Qwen builds it for code generation, code reasoning and code repair. The published config sets a 32,768-token context by default; reaching the full 131,072 tokens requires YaRN scaling, which Qwen notes can degrade quality on shorter inputs.
Context window: InternVL2.5 78B accepts up to 32,768 tokens, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B up to 131,072. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
InternVL2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B at a glance
| Attribute | InternVL2.5 78B | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenGVLab | Alibaba |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-11-12 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Input price | Free / self-hosted | $0.18/M tokens |
| Output price | Free / self-hosted | $0.18/M tokens |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: InternVL2.5 78B 100%, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B 96%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to InternVL2.5 78B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, InternVL2.5 78B or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
InternVL2.5 78B and Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is InternVL2.5 78B cheaper than Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?
Compare $0.00000 vs $0.00018 on this page.