ModelRefs / Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B
Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B
Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
InternVL2.5 78B: InternVL2.5 78B is OpenGVLab's multimodal model in the ViT-MLP-LLM configuration, pairing the InternViT-6B-448px-V2.5 vision encoder with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct as its language model for roughly 78 billion parameters in total. It keeps InternVL 2.0's architecture and advances instead through training and test-time strategy and a larger, filtered data mixture. The project is released under the MIT licence, while the Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct component it embeds carries the Qwen licence.
Mistral Small 3.1: Mistral Small 3.1 is Mistral AI's 24-billion-parameter multimodal model, accepting text and image input across a context window of up to 128,000 tokens and published under Apache 2.0. Mistral reports inference speeds of 150 tokens per second and compares it with Gemma 3 and GPT-4o Mini in the same weight class. Its size and licence make it one of the larger models that remains practical to self-host on a single machine.
Context window: InternVL2.5 78B accepts up to 32,768 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
InternVL2.5 78B vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance
| Attribute | InternVL2.5 78B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenGVLab | Mistral AI |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-03-17 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | Free / self-hosted | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | Free / self-hosted | $0.3/M tokens |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: InternVL2.5 78B 100%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 or InternVL2.5 78B?
Mistral Small 3.1 and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Mistral Small 3.1 cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00000 on this page.