ModelRefs / Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Gemma 3 27B: Gemma 3 27B is the largest model in Google's third-generation open Gemma family, accepting text and images across a 128,000-token input context, with output drawn from the same budget. Images are normalised to 896x896 and encoded as 256 tokens each. Google cites support for more than 140 languages and an August 2024 knowledge cutoff. The weights are published under Google's Gemma Terms of Use rather than a standard open-source licence.
Qwen2.5-VL 72B: Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is the largest vision-language model in Alibaba's Qwen2.5-VL line, accepting images and video alongside text. Qwen highlights comprehension of videos over an hour long, structured extraction from documents such as invoices, forms and tables, visual grounding returned as bounding boxes or points, and agentic computer and phone use. The published config sets a 32,768-token context, and Qwen advises against YaRN extension here because it degrades temporal and spatial localisation.
Context window: Gemma 3 27B accepts up to 128,000 tokens, Qwen2.5-VL 72B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B at a glance
| Attribute | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Released | 2025-02-01 | 2025-01-26 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Output price | $0.3/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | Gemma-Terms | Qwen License |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Gemma 3 27B 68%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 75%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
- Cost Efficiency: Gemma 3 27B 95%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 100%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00000 on this page.