ModelRefs / Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3 Pro
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3 Pro
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3 Pro: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Gemini 3 Pro: Gemini 3 Pro is Google DeepMind's flagship multimodal model with a 2M-token context window spanning text, image, audio, and video inputs. It is built for long-context reasoning, document understanding, and multimodal agentic workflows.
Llama 4 Scout: Llama 4 Scout is Meta's efficiency-focused open-weights model with an exceptionally large 10M-token context window and vision support. It is optimized for long-document retrieval and low-cost inference at scale.
Context window: Gemini 3 Pro accepts up to 2,000,000 tokens, Llama 4 Scout up to 10,000,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Gemini 3 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout at a glance
| Attribute | Gemini 3 Pro | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Released | 2025-11-18 | 2025-04-01 |
| Context window | 2,000,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.34/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Llama-4-Community |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision, audio, video | text, vision |
Benchmarks reported for both
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Pro | Llama 4 Scout | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (accuracy) | 91.9 | 57.2 | 2025-11-18 / 2025-04-01 |
| MMMU-Pro (accuracy) | 81 | 59.6 | 2025-11-18 / 2025-04-01 |
Each row compares the same benchmark, the same reported metric, and the same task set. Scores are as published by their cited sources on the dates shown. Different runs still use different harnesses and prompts, so treat these as directional evidence rather than a head-to-head result.
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: Gemini 3 Pro 47%, Llama 4 Scout 94%. Llama 4 Scout leads on this dimension.
- Multimodal: Gemini 3 Pro 81%, Llama 4 Scout 74%. Gemini 3 Pro leads on this dimension.
- Reasoning: Gemini 3 Pro 56%, Llama 4 Scout 62%. Llama 4 Scout leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 3 Pro.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Gemini 3 Pro?
Llama 4 Scout and Gemini 3 Pro target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro?
Compare $0.00011 vs $0.00125 on this page.