ModelRefs / Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Gemini 2.0 Flash: Gemini 2.0 Flash is Google's multimodal workhorse, accepting text, image, audio and video input across a 1,048,576-token context window with an 8,192-token output limit and an August 2024 knowledge cutoff. Google's deprecations page gives it a shutdown date of 1 June 2026 and names gemini-3.6-flash as the replacement, and the Gemini API models page now lists it among previous models as shut down; it is retained here as a historical reference.
Gemma 3 27B: Gemma 3 27B is the largest model in Google's third-generation open Gemma family, accepting text and images across a 128,000-token input context, with output drawn from the same budget. Images are normalised to 896x896 and encoded as 256 tokens each. Google cites support for more than 140 languages and an August 2024 knowledge cutoff. The weights are published under Google's Gemma Terms of Use rather than a standard open-source licence.
Context window: Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts up to 1,000,000 tokens, Gemma 3 27B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B at a glance
| Attribute | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-02-01 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Gemma-Terms |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision, audio | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Gemini 2.0 Flash 75%, Gemma 3 27B 68%. Gemini 2.0 Flash leads on this dimension.
- Cost Efficiency: Gemini 2.0 Flash 93%, Gemma 3 27B 95%. Gemma 3 27B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemma 3 27B?
Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemma 3 27B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00010 on this page.