ModelRefs / Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Claude 3 Opus: Claude 3 Opus is Anthropic's February 2024 frontier model and the most capable of the original Claude 3 family, accepting text and image input across a 200,000-token context window. The claude-3-opus-20240229 snapshot was deprecated on 30 June 2025 and retired on Anthropic-operated platforms on 5 January 2026, with Claude Opus 4.8 named as its replacement.
Llama 4 Scout: Llama 4 Scout is Meta's efficiency-focused open-weights model with an exceptionally large 10M-token context window and vision support. It is optimized for long-document retrieval and low-cost inference at scale.
Context window: Claude 3 Opus accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Llama 4 Scout up to 10,000,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout at a glance
| Attribute | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2025-04-01 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $0.34/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Llama-4-Community |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Benchmarks reported for both
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Llama 4 Scout | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (accuracy) | 50.4 | 57.2 | 2024-03-04 / 2025-04-01 |
Each row compares the same benchmark, the same reported metric, and the same task set. Scores are as published by their cited sources on the dates shown. Different runs still use different harnesses and prompts, so treat these as directional evidence rather than a head-to-head result.
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Claude 3 Opus 38%, Llama 4 Scout 62%. Llama 4 Scout leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3 Opus vs Llama 4 Scout.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Llama 4 Scout?
Claude 3 Opus and Llama 4 Scout target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Compare $0.0150 vs $0.00011 on this page.