ModelRefs / Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B
Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B
Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Claude 3 Haiku: Claude 3 Haiku is the speed-and-cost tier of Anthropic's original Claude 3 family, built for high-volume work such as customer support, document triage and many small tasks in parallel, with image input across a 200,000-token context window. Anthropic measured it at 21,000 tokens per second for prompts under 32,000 tokens. The claude-3-haiku-20240307 snapshot was deprecated on 19 February 2026 and retired on Anthropic-operated platforms on 20 April 2026, with Claude Haiku 4.5 as the replacement.
Qwen2.5-VL 72B: Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is the largest vision-language model in Alibaba's Qwen2.5-VL line, accepting images and video alongside text. Qwen highlights comprehension of videos over an hour long, structured extraction from documents such as invoices, forms and tables, visual grounding returned as bounding boxes or points, and agentic computer and phone use. The published config sets a 32,768-token context, and Qwen advises against YaRN extension here because it degrades temporal and spatial localisation.
Context window: Claude 3 Haiku accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Qwen2.5-VL 72B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B at a glance
| Attribute | Claude 3 Haiku | Qwen2.5-VL 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Released | 2024-03-13 | 2025-01-26 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.25/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Output price | $1.25/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | Proprietary | Qwen License |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Claude 3 Haiku 12%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 75%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
- Cost Efficiency: Claude 3 Haiku 83%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 100%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen2.5-VL 72B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than Qwen2.5-VL 72B?
Compare $0.00025 vs $0.00000 on this page.