ModelRefs / Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1
Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1
Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Claude 3 Haiku: Claude 3 Haiku is the speed-and-cost tier of Anthropic's original Claude 3 family, built for high-volume work such as customer support, document triage and many small tasks in parallel, with image input across a 200,000-token context window. Anthropic measured it at 21,000 tokens per second for prompts under 32,000 tokens. The claude-3-haiku-20240307 snapshot was deprecated on 19 February 2026 and retired on Anthropic-operated platforms on 20 April 2026, with Claude Haiku 4.5 as the replacement.
Mistral Small 3.1: Mistral Small 3.1 is Mistral AI's 24-billion-parameter multimodal model, accepting text and image input across a context window of up to 128,000 tokens and published under Apache 2.0. Mistral reports inference speeds of 150 tokens per second and compares it with Gemma 3 and GPT-4o Mini in the same weight class. Its size and licence make it one of the larger models that remains practical to self-host on a single machine.
Context window: Claude 3 Haiku accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance
| Attribute | Claude 3 Haiku | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Released | 2024-03-13 | 2025-03-17 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.25/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Claude 3 Haiku 12%, Mistral Small 3.1 63%. Mistral Small 3.1 leads on this dimension.
- Cost Efficiency: Claude 3 Haiku 83%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. Mistral Small 3.1 leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3.1.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Mistral Small 3.1?
Claude 3 Haiku and Mistral Small 3.1 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1?
Compare $0.00025 vs $0.00010 on this page.