ModelRefs / Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Claude 3.5 Haiku: Claude 3.5 Haiku is Anthropic's fast, low-cost model from late 2024, built for high-volume work such as classification, extraction and routing across a 200,000-token context window. The claude-3-5-haiku-20241022 snapshot was deprecated on 19 December 2025 and retired on Anthropic-operated platforms on 19 February 2026, with Claude Haiku 4.5 named as its replacement.
Gemini 2.0 Flash: Gemini 2.0 Flash is Google's multimodal workhorse, accepting text, image, audio and video input across a 1,048,576-token context window with an 8,192-token output limit and an August 2024 knowledge cutoff. Google's deprecations page gives it a shutdown date of 1 June 2026 and names gemini-3.6-flash as the replacement, and the Gemini API models page now lists it among previous models as shut down; it is retained here as a historical reference.
Context window: Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Gemini 2.0 Flash up to 1,000,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash at a glance
| Attribute | Claude 3.5 Haiku | Gemini 2.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Released | 2024-11-04 | 2025-02-05 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.8/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $4/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | No, hosted only |
| Modalities | text | text, vision, audio |
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Claude 3.5 Haiku 25%, Gemini 2.0 Flash 75%. Gemini 2.0 Flash leads on this dimension.
- Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.5 Haiku 65%, Gemini 2.0 Flash 93%. Gemini 2.0 Flash leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Flash target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Compare $0.00080 vs $0.00010 on this page.