ModelRefs / Text Embedding 3 Large by OpenAI — Benchmarks, Pricing & Re…

Text Embedding 3 Large by OpenAI — Benchmarks, Pricing & Re…

Text Embedding 3 Large (OpenAI): Text Embedding 3 Large by OpenAI.. 8K context. Pricing: from $0.00013/1K in. Specs, benchmarks and code examples.

What this reference supports

Text Embedding 3 Large is OpenAI's higher-capacity hosted text embedding model, intended for retrieval, semantic search, clustering, and RAG pipelines. It supports shortened embedding dimensions to trade storage and speed against quality, and should be evaluated on your own corpus rather than by chat-model intuition.

Text Embedding 3 Large is attributed to OpenAI in ModelRefs' canonical registry. Tracked modalities: Text input, Vector embedding output. Primary use cases considered on ModelRefs: Retrieval-augmented generation and semantic search over private corpora; Clustering, deduplication, and similarity ranking where embedding quality matters more than latency.

This ModelRefs profile is Provisional and pending review — decision-support material, not a final or universal ranking. Confirm current behavior, access, pricing, limits, licensing, and lifecycle in OpenAI's own documentation, and evaluate Text Embedding 3 Large on representative workloads before implementation.

Benchmark & Evaluation

ModelRefs currently has partial, narrow benchmark coverage for Text Embedding 3 Large. Treat the available benchmark evidence as one input to the decision, not a guarantee that Text Embedding 3 Large is the strongest option for your workload, and evaluate it on representative workloads before selecting it.

  • No benchmark score is imported into this editorial record. Canonical benchmark runs and scores are governed separately with their own provenance and render only through those records; coverage in ModelRefs is currently narrow (partial), so any scored comparison must show its coverage limits.
  • ModelRefs holds canonical run evidence on retrieval benchmarks (MTEB, MIRACL); coverage is narrow and results are corpus-dependent.

Implementation considerations

  • Choose the embedding dimension deliberately: reducing dimensions lowers storage and query cost but can reduce retrieval quality, so measure recall on your own data.
  • Pair with a re-ranking or evaluation step; raw nearest-neighbor recall rarely equals end-task answer quality.
  • Hosted through the OpenAI embeddings API endpoint.
  • Verify current dimensions, rate limits, retention controls, and pricing for the exact account tier before rollout.

Risks and limitations

  • Embedding quality is task- and domain-specific: retrieval/RAG performance depends on chunking, distance metric, and re-ranking, and does not follow chat-model quality intuitions.
  • Hosted embedding behavior, dimensions, pricing, and lifecycle can change; verify the current model snapshot and deprecation status before production reliance.

Source coverage

This reference is Provisional. Model behavior, access, pricing, limits, licensing, and lifecycle can change; verify the linked provider documentation and run task-specific evaluations before implementation.

Known coverage gaps:

  • Corpus-specific retrieval evaluation and re-ranking guidance are not attached.
  • Dimension-vs-quality trade-off needs task-level evidence on representative data.

Sources

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Text Embedding 3 Large by OpenAI — Benchmarks, Pricing & Re….